Topic: 3D over USB
Topiced View
-
05-21-2012, 06:04 PM #11Silver Member
Achievements:



- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- 32PFL7606K FW Q5551-0.14.93.0_bld11a
- Posts
- 188
- Points
- 2,368
- Level
- 13
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
- Rep Power
- 3
Well, I wouldn't want to watch Active3D 24/7 either :-)
Actually, I'd rather watch passive3D 24/7, because the Passive glasses are much lighter compared to Active glasses.
Regarding the resolution - for a smaller TV, the halfed horizontal resolution is actually fine.
And without a special HDMI 3D Player and source, which does provide 2x1920x1080 (which is still rare afaik), you will have the same "halfed" resolution, even with Active3D
Still, I agree, for 3D, it would probably have been better to make a top-bottom layout "the default" instead of side-by-side,
as this would allow a finer horizontal=depth resolution.
Also, it would better match the line-wise passive polarization from Philips.
Even though, I still prefer passive 3D. I think it's much less straining to the eyes than active 3D.


Reply With Quote
Bookmarks