Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20
  • Topic Tools
  • Display
  • Bookmark and Share
  1. #16
    Bronze Member
    Points: 1,233, Level: 9
    Level completed: 42%, Points required for next Level: 117
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Vienna/Austria
    Posts
    26
    Points
    1,233
    Level
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    I changed from WiFi to cabled Ethernet; since I changed, I have no problems at all. With WiFi I had a lot of problems, like described above.

  2. #17
    Silver Member
    Points: 2,385, Level: 13
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 65
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registeredTagger Second Class1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    88
    Points
    2,385
    Level
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    4
    I also stopped using the NP3900's Wi-Fi interface --- because the place where I want to use the NP3900 happens to have poor Wi-Fi reception. Now the NP3900 is connected to the LAN by means of cables and a pair of HomePlug AV powerline Ethernet adapters. This is a solution I would recommend to others in similar situations.

  3. #18
    Bronze Member
    Points: 1,233, Level: 9
    Level completed: 42%, Points required for next Level: 117
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Vienna/Austria
    Posts
    26
    Points
    1,233
    Level
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    I chose exactly the same solution, powerline Ethernet adapters.
    It is very sad, that the NP3900 seems to be a great device (other than some of it´s predecessors), but Philips messed up the WLAN implementation.

  4. #19
    Silver Member
    Points: 2,385, Level: 13
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 65
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registeredTagger Second Class1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    88
    Points
    2,385
    Level
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    4
    "Messed up" seems a bit strong. Its Wi-Fi reception is not outstanding and the NP3900 seems not to like some brands of access point, but within 15 meters of my Linksys WRT54G access point my NP3900 works equally well with Wi-Fi and cable Ethernet connections.

    I wonder if we will start seeing built-in HomePlug AV in household electronic gear. It has advantages in comparison with Wi-Fi: easier to setup, more reliable, faster, less RF-polluting, better range in some cases.

  5. #20
    Bronze Member
    Points: 1,233, Level: 9
    Level completed: 42%, Points required for next Level: 117
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Vienna/Austria
    Posts
    26
    Points
    1,233
    Level
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jdthood View Post
    "Messed up" seems a bit strong...
    The NP3900 is no cheap product. WiFi is no new technology. I do not own any other product, which has WiFi problems which are comparable with the NP3900.
    Therefore from my point of view, Philips messed up with WiFi! Perhaps a later Firmware update brings corrections, but at this point Philips does not acknowledge any of the problems mentioned by me or other customers.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •