Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 62
  • Topic Tools
  • Display
  • Bookmark and Share
  1. #1
    New Member
    Points: 1,024, Level: 8
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 126
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2
    Points
    1,024
    Level
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Best software for picture quality 9705

    Hi there,

    I have read here and also in other forums that soft 40 36 and 37 bring a drop in image quality, and that 34 was the best so far. I could not find records about oicture quality on 38 or 39.

    What is your opinion ? Philips and users

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Silver Member
    Points: 3,881, Level: 18
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 369
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!
    Freddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    219
    Points
    3,881
    Level
    18
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    4
    Hello Fabrizio,

    that's an interesting discussion! Kinda touchy as well, I believe... But I do hope more will tell us their experiences regarding the differences in picture quality between the many different firmware versions!

    I for one have been following the discussions on four different forums (in Dutch/English/German) since the day the 9705 came out, so I have made a list of all the reported differences. I translated all the complains and direct comparisons in grades, ranging from 1 (worst) to 10 (best) and these are the results:

    Firmware: Pict.-Quality:
    . 075.60 . . . . . . 6
    . 140.11 . . . . . . 8
    . 140.23 . . . . . . 9
    . 140.25 . . . . . . 9
    . 140.27 . . . . . . 5
    . 140.29 . . . . . . 5
    . 140.32 . . . . . . 7
    . 140.34 . . . . . . 8
    . 140.36 . . . . . . 5
    . 140.37 . . . . . . 5
    . 140.39 . . . . . . 7
    . 140.40 . . . . . . 6
    . 140.44 . . . . . . 7
    . 140.45 . . . . . . 6
    . 140.46 . . . . . . 6
    . 140.47 . . . . . . 5

    That's interesting, isn't it!?... Anyone care (or dare ) to comment?...
    Last edited by Freddy; 05-08-2012 at 01:03 PM. Reason: Added 140.47

  3. #3
    New Member
    Points: 1,024, Level: 8
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 126
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2
    Points
    1,024
    Level
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Thanks freddy. Let's hope the rest of people give their input also

  4. #4
    Silver Member
    Points: 2,268, Level: 13
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 182
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    188
    Points
    2,268
    Level
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    4
    after 0.25 all other firmwear are poor for 2d pictuer

  5. #5
    Bronze Member
    Points: 1,794, Level: 11
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 56
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    33
    Points
    1,794
    Level
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Why would philips degrade the picture? What is the purpose of it, surely they should be making the picture better?

  6. #6
    Bronze Member
    Points: 963, Level: 8
    Level completed: 7%, Points required for next Level: 187
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered500 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    south
    Posts
    22
    Points
    963
    Level
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    So, if the best quality ever seen on this product is 9/10, why don't you fix this in the software 140.41 (and the others after) to HAVE THIS QUALITY ?

  7. #7
    Silver Member
    Points: 2,268, Level: 13
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 182
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    188
    Points
    2,268
    Level
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    4
    its got be a reson why the pictuer haz degraded with the new softwears i think they are trying to fix some thing and making a mess out of the pictuer qulity but philips dont whant to shear this with us

  8. #8
    New Member
    Points: 767, Level: 7
    Level completed: 9%, Points required for next Level: 183
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered500 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2
    Points
    767
    Level
    7
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    3D PS3 on 9705

    Hi,

    I'm sorry for my english...

    I have a 9705 40" and I see the movies and games from Play Station 3. The problem when using the 3D, the image isn't nitid (background and first layer).

    It's normal? Anyone else have the same problem?

    Thanks,

  9. #9
    Platinum Member
    Points: 4,691, Level: 20
    Level completed: 11%, Points required for next Level: 359
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registeredTagger Second Class1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Athens/Greece
    Posts
    640
    Points
    4,691
    Level
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by lotemps View Post
    Hi,

    I'm sorry for my english...

    I have a 9705 40" and I see the movies and games from Play Station 3. The problem when using the 3D, the image isn't nitid (background and first layer).

    It's normal? Anyone else have the same problem?

    Thanks,
    I cannot understand your question. What does "nitid" mean?

  10. #10
    Platinum Member
    Points: 4,691, Level: 20
    Level completed: 11%, Points required for next Level: 359
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registeredTagger Second Class1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Athens/Greece
    Posts
    640
    Points
    4,691
    Level
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    4
    Has anyone any opinion on the 140.44 firmware?
    I thing that the DVB-T picture quality is very good.

  11. #11
    Silver Member
    Points: 2,268, Level: 13
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 182
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    188
    Points
    2,268
    Level
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by petasis View Post
    Has anyone any opinion on the 140.44 firmware?
    I thing that the DVB-T picture quality is very good.
    i cant comment on that as i dont use tvs tuner i use freeview hd box it looked better than 0.40 but not good as 0.25

  12. #12
    Silver Member
    Points: 3,881, Level: 18
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 369
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!
    Freddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    219
    Points
    3,881
    Level
    18
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    4
    Hi Ali,

    what you're saying is similar to what some others have said around the web. But to complete our list, how did the 140.44 compare to 140.34?...

  13. #13
    Silver Member
    Points: 2,268, Level: 13
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 182
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    188
    Points
    2,268
    Level
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Freddy View Post
    Hi Ali,

    what you're saying is similar to what some others have said around the web. But to complete our list, how did the 140.44 compare to 140.34?...
    hi freddy
    i dident get a chance to test the 0.44 propely as i had problem with sound clicking but from what i remeber i gev it 6 or 7 for pictuer qulity the only softwear that comes close to 0.25 is 0.34 we need to start to vote for 0.25 back.and what was your thougts of 0.44

  14. #14
    Silver Member
    Points: 3,881, Level: 18
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 369
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!
    Freddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    219
    Points
    3,881
    Level
    18
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by ali54 View Post
    the only softwear that comes close to 0.25 is 0.34 we need to start to vote for 0.25 back.and what was your thougts of 0.44
    I didn't try 140.44, because it doesn't solve my only really big problem: the subtitle dimming bug. Except for that, that truly annoying behavior, I'm very happy with my 140.25!...
    But based on a number of reports around the web, including yours, I updated the PQ List in post #2.

  15. #15
    Silver Member
    Points: 2,268, Level: 13
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 182
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience PointsNew Achievement!

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    188
    Points
    2,268
    Level
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Freddy View Post
    I didn't try 140.44, because it doesn't solve my only really big problem: the subtitle dimming bug. Except for that, that truly annoying behavior, I'm very happy with my 140.25!...
    But based on a number of reports around the web, including yours, I updated the PQ List in post #2.
    god damm you freddy you useing 0.25 i wish i could go back to 0.25 but i cant and im stuck with this poor updates

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Similar Topics

  1. Bad quality Uitzendinggemist
    By BertO in forum Smart TV: Error Messages
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-01-2011, 09:15 AM
  2. 9705 and new parts
    By ali54 in forum TV: Other
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-19-2011, 09:12 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-21-2011, 11:57 AM
  4. Bad picture quality 32pfl5405H/12
    By makucv in forum TV: Software 2010 models
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-05-2011, 11:34 AM
  5. No Picture in Picture (PIP) on the Net TV homepage.
    By Philips in forum Smart TV: Error Messages
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-06-2010, 03:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •